|
12-20-06 Barna lists the 12 Most Significant Findings from the 2006 Survey. more?
12/10/06 What's in a Church's Name? Read More?
11-23-06 Who Will Save Thanksgiving? more . . .
11-20-06 Does Ministry Fuel Addictive Behavior? more . . .
11-20-06 What the church can learn from Starbucks more . . .
11-13-06 Barna update states "Rosie O’Donnell Stirs Christians’ Emotions" more . . .
11-3-6 Gun conficscation is alive and well in the USA. more...
11-3-06 Now the head of the National Association of Evangelicals has fallen. So sad.
more...
10-31-06 Barna finds that "A New Generation of Adults Bends Moral and Sexual Rules to Their Liking." more . . . (and on the day it came out!)
10-29-06 --- 71% of Americans Just Want a Good Night of Sleep; Barna found (from the 10-16 update better late?!?) more from this survey
10-24-06 Can God redeem Halloween? more. . .
10-24-06 Who’s More Spiritual: Emergent or Traditional Evangelicals? more . . .
10-24-06 Why former churchgoers STOP going. more . . .
10-24-06 Understanding your spouse's past. more . . .
10-24-06 Death of marriage? more . . .
10-24-06 Raise respectful kids. more . . .
10-24-06 Help your daughter develop a healthy sexual identity. more. . .
10-24-06 Spanking: Godly Discipline or Outdated Cruelty?more . . .
10-24-06 USAToday reports "Todays most successful CEO's were spanked as children." more from USAToday
10-21-06 The Rev. Dr. Fred Ansell Announces retirement
more...
10-13-06 Teens and the Company they keep. more . . .
10-13-06 More Halloween from Crosswalk.com more . . .
10-13-06 Halloween; what does the Bible Say? more . . .
10-12-6 Supremes reject request for 'Doe' abortion review: more...
10-12-6 Off beat news: Jupiter changes its spots! more...
10-8-06 Two Judges in California Court Uphold Marriage
more...
10-5-06 American Baptist Homes and Hospitals Association (ABHHA) recently changed its name to American Baptist Homes and Caring Ministries (ABHCM). more . . .
10-5-06 ABNS report "GENERAL EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CONTINUES PROCESS TO PROMOTE ADAPTIVE CHANGE" more . . .
10-04-06 School Violence: keeping kids safe
more...
10-04-06 Church: What will it look like? more . . .
10-04-06 Barna Survey on the Ups and Down of Tweens more . . .
09/29/06 Is giving this bad? Will holy doughnut be sold?
more...
9-21-06 To date or not to date that is a question for children and their parants! more . . .
9-21-06 Is your love for your spouce conditional? more. . .
9-21-06 Break the Generational Cycle of Divorce. more. . .
9-14-06 Episcopal Split? more. . .
9-14-06 Developing Church Health more . . .
9-12-06 Barna reports: On Twentysomethings. more . . .
9/11/06 Woodside Church (Flint MI) Dis-fellowshiping upheld by Region Board more . . .
9-2-06 Kirk of the Hills sues to get clear title to building. more. . .
9-2-06 What school is the right school for your child? more . . .
9-1-06 Kirk of the Hills Presbyterian leaves PCUSA. Their email letter
9-1-06 365 Gay.com reports on the Woodside dis-fellowshiping and a vote by a Tulsa church to remove themselves from PCUSA more . . .
8-31-06 What does God say about fathers? Read Rick Johnson's thoughts
8-31-06 ABC/MI has a statement in the E-Link concerning the disfellowshiping of Woodside Church Flint MI. It is titled "Exec Comm Responds to North Area Vote". more . . .
8/30/06 Woodside Church (Flint MI) Dis-fellowshiped by Association more . . .
8-28-06 Barna reports "Five years later, September 11th attacks show no lasting effect on Americans' Faith" more . . .
8-25-06 The "Morning-After pill" now available over the counter more . . .
8-24-06 The Texas group producing the One Million Dollar Bill tract appeals ruling. more . . .
8-24-06 These two blogs from Out of Ur look interesting the first entitled Family Faith Feud: Why are young adults not finding their places in their parents’ church? Read? The Second; Scum of the Church: How the drive for “excellence” is driving young adults from the church. Read?
8-23-06 Church sues Fairfax County to keep religion classes. The Churches statement Fairfax County responds
|
Durable Data (Glen Layne) blogged this piece on Worship; think about it! From Oct. 22, 2006 http://www.durabledata.blogspot.com/ More Than a Reasonable Truce in the Worship Wars.
I write a column for the Temple City News, the local monthly paper circulated by the Chamber of Commerce. Here's my November column.
The last twenty years may go down in church history as the era of the worship wars. No shots were fired, but plenty of shouts were. Basically, in the worship wars, the traditionalists were lined up against the contemporarists. One faction saw worship being degraded into performance, while the other saw worship being rescued from irrelevance.
I thought I’d lay forth some propositions that hopefully lay this misguided war to rest. I write as someone who is worship ambidextrous. What I mean is that I can really worship in a highly liturgical setting as well as something that’s as free-flowing as a Friends meeting or a Pentecostal service.
1. We don’t understand worship if we think it’s about us. It’s not. It’s about God. It’s not a show.
2. The essence of worship is expressed love to God. That’s the heart of worship. Love of God is the Great Commandment, Part 1 (see Mark 12:28-30). In worship, believers express that love. Real worship should be occurring all the time. Gathered worship has its own unique place and power.
3. We all develop our worship language, and can learn new words. “Worship language” is a term my old friend Mark Hamilton introduced to me. By that we mean that patterns of worship we have become accustomed to. For some, that’s a diet of Fanny Crosby songs, for others it’s Bach, for others, it’s Maranatha Praise Band.
Just as we can learn a new language by a combination of effort, practice and desire, so we can learn a new worship language as well. It’s just lazy to refuse to grow because, “That’s what I was raised with.”
4. There is no virtue in worship that raises unnecessary walls for non-believers. When I teach our new member class at First Baptist, I actually show a picture of the “culture gap” that God has called the church to bridge. It’s interesting how much the book of Acts describes the importance of cross-cultural communication. In Acts, Jewish believers in Jesus first have to struggle with communicating the faith to Samaritans and then to utterly pagan Gentiles. If you follow the story carefully, new cultural clusters are brought into the fold: in the northern Levant area, then in what is now central Turkey, then the western Aegean area, then Macedonia-Greece, then Rome. Each new area required a contextualization of the Jesus message that was appropriate to the area without compromising His message.
Part of that must have included worship and musical style. Jewish styles had to yield to Greek and Roman styles, or the style would have gotten in the way of the message. The message was too important to compromise or to block by mere style.
5. I don’t have to have worship my way—as a matter of fact, it’s good that I don’t. If worship is about God and not me, and if worship style should not be a barrier to worship, then it follows that I don’t have to have to have worship my way—as a matter of fact, it’s good that I don’t! If it were always to my liking, then I would be saying that it is all about me!
But there’s another reason. According to Philippians 2:3, believers should “in humility consider others better than yourselves.” The needs of others, including the need to worship in their “native worship language”, comes before my need (or preference) every time! Always having things “my way” breeds selfishness and arrogance on my part. Sacrificing my preferences for others breeds humility and tender-heartedness instead.
So, when you worship, and it’s not your preferred worship language, praise God for the ones who are worshipping, and in a sense, worship through their worship. And when worship is in your worship language, pray for the forbearance of others. And that is not only a truce in the worship wars—it’s real worship!
If We (Evangelicals) Stay There are still many evangelicals who don’t want to withdrawal from ABC. They still believe that there is a possibility for reformation. I don’t think so because for decades evangelicals have been (and I think still are) unwilling to do the things necessary to bring about reform, and without such willingness and follow through the options are only two: 1. Go 2. Stay. If true reformation, renewal, or revival is to come to ABC, evangelicals need to be willing not only to post their 95 thesis on the internet, but be willing to act in concert in ways that will be excoriated by our liberal brothers and friends in places of power within the current structure. The current denominational by-laws and rules are designed to keep evangelicals from gaining a majority in positions that can vote to bring change, while insuring that a liberal majority is almost always in ascendancy (since way back in 1968 I’ve been voting against the changes in denominational structure that have allowed this situation to occur). With the design and layout of ABCUSA structures favoring the control of liberal leadership and blocking the resurgence of a majority evangelicalism at decision making levels, baptist evangelicals who have anything other than fantasy hopes for a return to biblical authority, need to take a new course. If reformation is possible, it can come if (and it is a big “if”)evangelicals are willing to become “inside outsiders.” ABC evangelicals need to put their ministries and monies outside of denomination structures. For example: Evangelicals ought to form an independent version of BNM. Call it “Alternative North American Ministries in the churches of the ABC,” or some such nom de plume indicating it’s connected to the autonomous churches, but not with the denomination. Through it, commission evangelical missionaries under the direction of evangelical churches. Raise their mission support from the evangelical churches, and expend it outside of ABCUSA checkbooks. Over time it will grow to be the dominant national ministry group connected to ABC local churches. Evangelicals should form a national Evangelical Pastors Council as an alternative to the Ministers’ Council that exists at this time. This new council would be open to evangelical pastors (youth workers and other ministry personnel) who are willing to sign, preach, and live by a biblical statement of faith. This would provide evangelical pastors (and through them their churches) a continuous voice to raise evangelical concerns to current denomination leadership representing the many evangelical pastors (“All for one, one for all.”), and help allieviate the leaning some churches have towards leaving the denomination. Evangelicals, if they remain in ABC, need to keep the mission monies flowing, but not through United Mission. All giving that any evangelical churches do should be targeted and “specified” (SPC line on “Monthly Report Of Missions Support” form) to evangelical missionaries, ministries, and good works, that will carry on the good ABC Missions has done in the past, but in the exclusive context of a biblical message of salvation through Christ, and reform for individuals and society. Evangelicals need to be willing to begin a new unit, region, association, or committee whenever they find that an ABCUSA configuration does not represent evangelical thought and positions, and in the event there is intransigence to change in the national leadership’s approach to biblical ministry these alternatives could form the basis of an entirely new body of Baptist churches.
Well Durable Data (Glenn Layne) did it again! He has given us something to think about! Here it is his August 23rd blog. Do Churches Need Buildings? This is a monthly column I write for Temple City Life.
UNCOMMON SENSE
With Glenn Layne
DO CHURCHES NEED BUILDINGS?
Often when I meet someone, and they learn I am a pastor, they say, “So where’s your church?” I dutifully answer, “It’s the brick church on Baldwin Avenue, just north of Las Tunas.” Usually that does it unless they say, “But I thought that was in Arcadia.” Oh, life on the city line. But when I answer their question, there’s a little theological voice in the back of my head that says, “You mean, where does the church I serve meet?” In reality, come 2 AM on a Tuesday night, and you will find an empty church meeting building, but the church is out there, living in Temple City, Arcadia, San Gabriel, El Monte, Monrovia, Baldwin Park, Alhambra…that’s the real church.
There are times I hate having a building. Buildings are expensive. You have to build ‘em, heat ‘em, cool ‘em, pay for electricity and water and my person least favorite, insurance. It’s an interesting fact: go back to the New Testament, it’s nothing less than amazing how fast early Christians became indifferent to the Temple. The Temple in Jerusalem was the largest temple on earth—larger than any temple in Rome or Greece or India or China. But one of the last things Jesus taught on was that within a generation of His death, the Temple would be destroyed; more than that, He put Himself forward as the True Temple of God, God’s true dwelling place, and later in the New Testament the people who followed Jesus were also called God’s Temple. But early Christians were uninterested in the Jerusalem Temple or any other building as God’s dwelling.
It was about 400 years before Christians started building church buildings. That time lag corresponded with a loss of the clear teachings of Jesus and the apostles that buildings no longer sufficed to be the “dwelling of God.” The human heart lurches back to shrines and temples and churches that are regarded as “the house of God.” So for the next 1,600 Christiana constructed bigger and bigger palaces for God, from Constantinople to Rome to London—to a glass cathedral in Garden Grove.
I find myself asking a question. Do churches need buildings? Clearly, Biblically the answer is NO. We did fine without them for 400 years. If we need to, we can do without them again. When I was a college student, the school I went to had a winter term option in Salzburg, Austria. A soaring cathedral dominates the center of the old city. Other Gothic and Rococo structures grace the city. But my favorite place of worship was cut into the hillside a short walk from the cathedral. The guide said that this cave was modified by early Christians as a place of worship no later than 200 AD. It was crude and dark. And I felt at home. Yes, we can go back to the catacombs if we need to.
But I am the pastor of a church that owns a chunk of real estate here in Temple City—six buildings and two homes! What does that mean for us?
In a word: if a church owns property, they’d better justify it by heavy use. One of the things that makes me happy is how heavily used our property is. I don’t know how many times I’ve driven on to the church campus and seen a lot full of cars, and I had no idea what was going on! We love to extend the use of the property to the community.
For example, we host two other congregations (Rock Mountain—Mandarin-speaking and the Kachin-Burmese church.) We have a preschool (started here in 1965, one of the oldest in the LA area). We have two ESL classes with nearly 100 students. We host the dinners for the Blue Banner project as well as the interdenominational Men’s Bible Study Fellowship. Periodically, we’ve hosted after-school tutoring, as well as fund-raising dinners for People for People and for various area school auxiliaries. We’re hoping to add citizenship classes this fall as well as a drop in center for immigrants and others. In other words, we are convinced that God put us here to serve and bless the community. Why? Well, as I like to put it, to make Jesus look good.
On the other hand, I cannot imagine a worse use of God’s resources than a church that’s open for a few hours on Sunday, maybe a weekday Bible study and choir practice. That’s inward-looking and downright selfish. That’s a church as a shrine, a temple. God calls the church to be people—and if we own property, it had better be to bless the whole community.
|